Desperate circumstances cause human beings to make questionable decisions.
          Take the Detroit City Council, please. They recently approved by a
          vote of 7 – 2, a proposal to purchase city-owned property with the
          intent of creating an area known as  African
          Town. The purpose
          of African Town would be to create an economic development zone promoting
          black owned businesses. Detroit could do much worse. It could be like
          Washington, D.C., which has just entered into an economically ruinous
          agreement to bring the Montreal Expos, a baseball team no other city
          wants, to a brand new RFK stadium. Taxpayers will foot the $440 million
          bill for this  corporate
          welfare handout. 
        The impetus for African Town and homes for moribund baseball teams
          is the same. Black urban areas are in bad shape. High unemployment
          rates, a dwindling tax base and a lack of community owned businesses
          are all recipes for high crime, bad schools, and well meaning but foolish
          solutions.
        In their infinite wisdom, the members of the Detroit City Council
          added an extra dose of unneeded drama to an already bad situation.
          It is true that Detroit’s city government created a Greektown and a
          Mexican Town to promote tourism and economic development. The idea
          of an African Town is equally legitimate, and yet it would have the
          dubious distinction of recommending that immigrant groups be excluded
          from enjoying any of its benefits. 
        The Council commissioned the report, “A PowerNomics Economic Development
          Plan for Detroit's Under-Served Majority Population,” from Dr. Claud
          Anderson. Dr. Anderson’s  report makes statements such as this.
        "For Blacks, immigration has always had negative consequences.
          It has harmed Native Blacks in Detroit and across the nation." 
        Black American resentment of immigrants is not new, neither is it
          unfounded. The group most subject to oppression and the resulting inability
          to build wealth, watches again and again as people from every corner
          of the globe move into their neighborhoods and accomplish what they
          have been prevented from doing. To add insult to injury they are then
          told that the newcomers’ success is proof of their own worthlessness.
        Needless to say, the immigrants in question are not happy about taking
          the blame for all of Detroit’s deeply entrenched problems. Asian, Latino
          and Arab groups rallied against the proposal and demanded an  apology from the City Council. The anti-immigrant sentiment in the
          report begs another question. Would black Americans in Detroit and
          elsewhere be better off if immigrants left? Would their businesses
          suddenly become owned by black people? 
        Residents in those communities not already in business for themselves
          would not magically turn into entrepreneurs. The lack of access to
          capital is an ongoing problem that would not be resolved if Koreans
          no longer sold black people their own hair care products. 
        The furor created by the African Town proposal raises another issue.
          Detroit’s population is 80% black. In theory, the entire city
          should be a boom town for black people. If a majority black
          population and black political leadership can’t provide economic development
          for Detroit, then the African Town discussion is a waste of time and
          energy that might be better spent developing a real plan for that city. 
        Detroit is doomed if its elected representatives spend time and money
          to commission reports that only result in made up terms like “PowerNomics,” hurt
          feelings, and lots of back and forth in editorial columns. Perhaps
          Detroit should have taken the Montreal Expos. Two baseball teams might
          succeed where “PowerNomics” failed. Then again, maybe Detroit needs
          Ebonics. The City Council could host an Ebonics/PowerNomics summit
          that would bring millions of dollars to city coffers.
        It is easy to make fun of all this sound and fury, but the rest of
          the country is no better than Detroit. New York City just suffered
          through major inconveniences and a mini police state in order to host
          the Republican National Convention. Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a billionaire,
          promised a windfall for New York but the event may end up  costing          the city $309 million. 
        The corporate model for development simply does not work. It doesn’t
          work in Detroit, in Washington, or in New York. The Detroit City Council
          and city councils throughout the nation should think of these words
          the next time they address this all important issue: