Bookmark and Share
Click to go to the home page.
Click to send us your comments and suggestions.
Click to learn about the publishers of and our mission.
Click to search for any word or phrase on our Website.
Click to sign up for an e-Mail notification only whenever we publish something new.
Click to remove your e-Mail address from our list immediately and permanently.
Click to read our pledge to never give or sell your e-Mail address to anyone.
Click to read our policy on re-prints and permissions.
Click for the demographics of the audience and our rates.
Click to view the patrons list and learn now to become a patron and support
Click to see job postings or post a job.
Click for links to Websites we recommend.
Click to see every cartoon we have published.
Click to read any past issue.
Click to read any think piece we have published.
Click to read any guest commentary we have published.
Click to view any of the art forms we have published.

What good is the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) to the re-election of Black members of the U.S. House of Representatives? The inquiring minds of the CBC Monitor would like to know after reading numerous articles describing what amounts to political extortion on the part of DCCC Chair Rep. Rahm Emmanuel (D-IL), who forces Democratic House members to pay the equivalent of a congressmember’s salary on a sliding scale – $100,000 to start, and ranging to $600,000, depending on leadership status. How does this payment of “dues” help members of the Black Caucus?

The DCCC fund, which finances incumbents and candidates favored by Rep. Emmanuel, does little to nothing for CBC members. 

To meet Emmanuel’s demands for exorbitant dues, CBC members and other Democrats are pressured to turn to corporate interests for donations. Most Black members of congress hold what are considered “safe” seats in their districts although, theoretically, any CBC member can go from “safe incumbent” to what is referred to on the DCCC’s website as “frontline” members. 

A “frontline” member is a congressperson considered vulnerable to electoral defeat. According to the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call, congressional incumbents who are “frontline” do not have to pay the $100,000 (minimum) dues, and the DCCC pours money into their campaigns to assist them in winning re-election.  Very few CBC members are classed as “frontline,” yet they are expected to pay their dues to the DCCC or have their privileges revoked.

The scheme puts Rep. Emmanuel, a prominent member of the rightist Democratic Leadership Council, in the position of king- or queen-maker. He decides which candidates and incumbents will benefit from a fund to which all Democrats in the House contribute.

Where was the DCCC when Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) faced a successful primary challenge in 2002, when Georgia’s open primary allowed registered Republicans to vote for McKinney’s “Democratic” opponent, Denise Majette?  McKinney sure could have benefited from DCCC largesse then.

It appears that the DCCC was equally absent when McKinney ran to regain her seat in 2004.  No matter. McKinney won handily, with more than 60% of the vote, and less than $100,000 in her campaign coffers.

Actually, there should be more CBC members classified as “frontline” – vulnerable to defeat. Two thirds of the Black Caucus voted for the telecommunications giants’ horrendous COPE Act, which would end Internet neutrality. The CBC Monitor’s twice-yearly Report Card lists five members as “derelict,” based on their voting records.

Yet, none of the “derelict” or “underachiever” Black members of congress are on the DCCC’s “frontline” list. These members solicit plenty of corporate contributions and, in return, forsake their commitment to the Black community.

The following chart (from Roll Call) shows which congresspersons are seriously in arrears to the DCCC.

The chart was also posted on the web site, Daily Kos. One reader noted that the DCCC’s dues regime actually endangers the reelection chances of Black Indianapolis Rep. Julia Carson.

“…you have to remember that she (Carson) ‘owes’ $150,000 and only has $270,000 for her campaign.  That would take away more than half out of her war chest away from her …. She would, in effect, be giving away half of her cash and risking her own re-election to fund someone else’s campaign.”

Interesting to note: when members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus believed their issues were being taken for granted by the DCCC, they stood together as a body and told House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) as well as Chairman Emmanuel that they weren’t paying a dime in dues until they got a seat at the Democratic Caucus table (La Prensa San Diego, March 11, 2005).

The result?  Pelosi caved in and met with an angry Hispanic Caucus soon after learning of their demands.  Emmanuel followed up a week later.  The Hispanic Caucus got what they wanted: inclusion in the decision-making processes of Democratic leadership.

Too bad CBC Chairman Rep. Mel Watt (D-NC) has failed to leverage the weight of the Congressional Black Caucus in similar fashion.

Under Rahm Emmanuel, the DCCC has become an arm of the Democratic Leadership Council – a mechanism that forces members of all political persuasions to fund incumbents and candidates favored by the corporate wing of the party. Emmanuel’s dues demands often exceed the amount of money congresspersons spend on their own campaigns, forcing them to turn to corporate funders for support. No good can come of it.

Leutisha Stills can be reached at The CBC Monitor's website is



Your comments are always welcome.

Visit the Contact Us page to send e-Mail or Feedback

or Click here to send e-Mail to

e-Mail re-print notice

If you send us an e-Mail message we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold your name.

Thank you very much for your readership.


July 20, 2006
Issue 192

is published every Thursday.

Printer Friendly Version in resizeable plain text format
Cedille Records Sale