Bookmark and Share
Click to go to the home page.
Click to send us your comments and suggestions.
Click to learn about the publishers of BlackCommentator.com and our mission.
Click to search for any word or phrase on our Website.
Click to sign up for an e-Mail notification only whenever we publish something new.
Click to remove your e-Mail address from our list immediately and permanently.
Click to read our pledge to never give or sell your e-Mail address to anyone.
Click to read our policy on re-prints and permissions.
Click for the demographics of the BlackCommentator.com audience and our rates.
Click to view the patrons list and learn now to become a patron and support BlackCommentator.com.
Click to see job postings or post a job.
Click for links to Websites we recommend.
Click to see every cartoon we have published.
Click to read any past issue.
Click to read any think piece we have published.
Click to read any guest commentary we have published.
Click to view any of the art forms we have published.

The current issue is always free to all readers

If you need the access available to a
and cannot afford the $50 subscription price, request a complimentary subscrpition here.

There’s no drama like Hollywood drama. Yet, in two different situations, two different extremes played out to show how race in America offers great disparities in opportunities to correct social wrongs. The lessons of race in America continue to frame how we perceive each other and how the institutional systems react to those who violate law and social protocol. First, I want to say that there are much more important things in the world than Paris Hilton. This hyper-intensive media coverage of the adventures of a blonde bimbo hotel heiress sums up what popular culture has become, in terms of how the media feeds our minds irrelevant “garbage” in the guise of intellectual sustenance.

The life and times of Paris Hilton knocks war, poverty, space shuttle launches, and of course, political controversy off the front pages of newspapers in America. With an attention span of a five year old and celebrity fever feeding our intellect, no wonder President Bush was able to pull the wool over the eyes over most of the nation. Since when is Paris Hilton's violating probation and being sentenced to 45 days in jail really a “news item?” When celebrity justice makes a mockery of the criminal justice system. That was worthy of paying attention.

Paying our debts to society for running afoul of the law, has always been part of the American nomenclature. Except if you’re a celebrity in America. It is common knowledge that celebrities rarely do time. And if they do time, it’s often soft time. Drug and alcohol “rehab” frequently is the alternative to jail time. It’s now a running joke. Enter Paris Hilton, a known “party girl” with a penchant for wild parties and alcohol, who got caught driving drunk, had her driver’s license suspended and was on probation, set out to make a joke of the criminal justice system by blatantly defying a court order not to drive.

Caught again, Hilton, who could afford to be driven from L.A. to New York, by taxi if she wanted, showed her blatant disregard for the system by showing up in court, painting herself as “a victim” and to the surprise of all was sentenced to 45 days in jail (of which she only had to serve 23 days).

Now in L.A. County, you can pick your jail, “buy up” your accommodations and do your time. Not Paris Hilton, after five days—she was back home and a national firestorm ensued. Why? Because a spoiled rich white girl somehow manipulated the system, again.

The public finally recognize celebrity justice as social injustice when double standards afford the rich and famous numerous opportunities to break the law and avoid jail. Media activist Najee Ali, who had to do his whole 45 days for the same violation (driving on a suspended license, not the DUI), went ballistic. And he should have. Yes, the jails are overcrowded, but there are many more lower level offenders who could have been released before Paris Hilton. The corrections system got straight up fronted off the court system, and we can’t have that, can we? They usually work in collusion. The point is, Hilton did nothing the system wanted her to do, and still got “all the breaks” (loopholes and technicalities) the system could afford. The public objected to what was clearly preferential treatment, Paris was sent back to jail (to do her full 45 days) and all is well with the world again. Or is it?

The same day, another firestorm concluded when actor Isaiah Washington lost his feature role as part of the ensemble cast of the top rated television show, Grey’s Anatomy. Washington, who created the firestorm by choking “Dr. Dreamy” (Patrick Dempsey) and coincidentally commenting that he was “not his little ‘fa**ot’” like another cast member who was in the closet at the time (but has since come out), had been trying (and managing) to repair his reputation over the past six months.  But the altercation became secondary to Washington's perceived “homophobia,” and Hollywood, being a industry run by…well, you know, weren’t going to rest until they had Washington’s head on a platter. They first put the “Angry Black Man” jacket on him, which goes onto anyone articulate enough to redefine themselves and defend their views. White boys with anger issues, like Sean Penn, Johnny Depp or Alec Baldwin, are “rebels,” “bad boys” or complex.  Black men always have to be angry. I’ve had that thrown on me a couple times. It’s a tough one to shake, and the more calm you get—the more people try to provoke you. They asked Washington to take anger management “rehab,” which he did, then they provoked him again at the Golden Globes, when Washington denied what he had said—and the standard in Hollywood is to deny everything—even when you know it’s true.

Washington again was held to a different standard and his denial, of course, brought out gay and lesbian activists wanting Washington to come in touch with his gay-sensitivity side, asking him to meet with them, renounce homophobia and do public service announcements, all of which Washington did. All of this was done in the attempt to restore harmony among the cast, knowing how networks resist tampering with successful formulas, and the Grey’s Anatomy cast is not the first cast to feud, while in the top ratings spot. Washington was not the only one to snap off camera, and go into a rage. The only difference between him and Alec Baldwin, who is also on a top rated show and has also gone through numerous forms of counseling, is that NBC stood by Baldwin. Only Baldwin berated his own child and not a whole segment of the population which, I suppose they considered to be somehow a lesser evil. Still, Baldwin, who hass punched photographers (and anybody else who gets in range) doesn’t have an “angry white man” jacket on him. The parallels here are the stunningly similar, but their outcomes are far from the same. It’s about how many life chances one gets to succeed (or fail).

Clearly the assumption here, whether stated or implied, is that if Washington—who is a central figure in the primetime drama—conformed and renounced his evil (socially impolitic) ways, he would be welcomed back for another season. Well, surprise, surprise, he’s not coming back—even though he did everything ABC asked him to do (causing his publicist Howard Bragman to suggest they made Washington “jump through hoops” for nothing), and it still netted him no reconsideration. Why? Because the Black man in American society rarely gets a second chance at anything—much less a prime opportunity. Washington publicly showed remorse and appreciation for the support he received during this controversy at the NAACP Image Awards earlier this year, but the “powers that be” never forgot what he said or what he did. Washington had earned his “Uppity Ni**er” status as far as they were concerned and his lynching (exit from the show) was therefore inevitable. No “good behavior” credits could be earned on his tainted, but repented, slate. He was served up. Paris Hilton, on the other hand, is still being viewed as a victim of her own celebrity—not as an unrepentant lawbreaker. Sympathy for her is overflowing. For Washington, it’s, “Oh well…” The paradox here goes beyond just celebrity. It’s about life chances, historical racial intolerance and disparities in opportunities. Hilton had (and has) many chances to fail. Washington had just one chance to fail. It’s one shot and out for the Black man.

Both Hilton and Washington were losers in the outcomes of their controversies. Mistakes were made by everybody, but one got more opportunities to correct her mistakes. One just got more opportunities to “lose” than the other. One deserved to lose because she complied with nothing asked of her, while the other one didn’t deserve to lose because he complied with everything that was asked of him. One got all the breaks (none of which she deserved) to avoid jail, while the other got no breaks (and deserved at least one, a chance to return for one more season). Just another day in the life of Hollywood, and the racial construct of America.

There is no drama like Hollywood drama, and race drama, in America. When combined, it’s over the top, in ratings and reality. Some things never change and are as plain as Black and white. They just manifest in newer, more contemporary forms. And there is no injustice like celebrity injustice.

BC Columnist Dr. Anthony Asadullah Samad is a national columnist, managing director of the Urban Issues Forum and author of the upcoming book, Saving The Race: Empowerment Through Wisdom. His Website is AnthonySamad.com. Click here to contact Dr. Samad.

Home

Your comments are always welcome.

e-Mail re-print notice

If you send us an e-Mail message we may publish all or part of it, unless you tell us it is not for publication. You may also request that we withhold your name.

Thank you very much for your readership.

 

June 14, 2007
Issue 233

is published every Thursday.

Printer Friendly Version in resizeable plain text format
Cedille Records Sale