On October 18,
                                liberals and some conservatives in major
                                American cities (including where I live) and
                                small rural towns in blue, red, and purple
                                states participated in “No
                                      Kings”
                                  rallies and marches to adamantly defend
                                  democracy and fiercely denounce President
                                  Trump’s increasingly autocratic behavior. It
                                  was one of the largest single-day protests in
                                  the nation’s history. 
                            That said, in
                                this age of chronic complaints and cynicism, the
                                naysayers began touting their anticipated
                                doubtful and dissuading rhetoric. Indeed, Trump
                                and his associates began complaining days before
                                the initial protesters took to the streets.
                                House Speaker Mike
                                Johnson referred to them as “hate America” rallies, a slogan quickly picked
                                      up by other conservative
                                      Republicans, and described
                                the “No Kings” protests as a crucible of
                                potential riots, representing “all
                                  the pro-Hamas wing and, you know, the antifa
                                  people.” “You’re gonna bring together the
                                  Marxists, the socialists, the antifa
                                  advocates, the anarchists, and the pro-Hamas
                                  wing of the far-left Democrat party,” he
                                      said. Tom Emmer, a
                                Republican representative for Minnesota,
                                described the rallies as a product of the “terrorist
                                      wing”
                                  of the Democratic Party.
                                Additionally, there were claims that the
                                protesters were “antifa” plants funded
                                by liberal billionaire George
                                      Soros. Texas
                                Republican Senator Ted
                                      Cruz falsely stated
                                that MSNBC’s video of massive crowds at “No
                                Kings” was actually footage from previous 2017
                                protests. President Trump dismissed the protests
                                as “a joke” and posted an obscene
                                      AI-generated video of a fighter
                                jet with him in the cockpit dropping what looked
                                like feces on “No Kings” marchers. 
                            Fortunately, the violence that Trump and
                                his minions appeared to thirst for failed to
                                materialize. Before the event, some seemed
                                fearful of what might transpire - whether
                                Trump-inspired federal law enforcement would
                                crack down with mass arrests or pro-Trump
                                militias would instigate a confrontation.
                                However, the demonstrations were serene, even
                                buoyant. Confrontational antics from either camp
                                were virtually nonexistent. In New York, Los
                                Angeles, Philadelphia, and several other of the
                                nation’s largest cities, upwards of seven
                                million marchers participated in “No Kings”
                                events with few reports of civil unrest or
                                arrests. 
                            While
                                disdain and derision were anticipated, if not
                                outright expected, from
                                the right, pockets of liberal and progressive
                                bloggers provided their own sobering analysis of
                                the event. More than a few “What did it
                                achieve?” postmortems kicked in. One notable
                                comment from a
                                      prominent social media user elicited that
                                general sentiment: “Can I ask, what did the ‘No
                                Kings’ protest actually accomplish? I mean, in
                                real terms, what have these protests materially
                                changed? I can’t help but feel these one-off
                                protests are merely a heatsink for energy and
                                anger rather than a path for meaningful change
                                and disruption of the system.” There were
                                others. These doubting Thomases could only judge
                                any colossal public display of dissent that fell
                                short of instantaneously terminating Trump and
                                his right-wing administration from the White
                                House as an insignificant failure. Talk about
                                wanting instant gratification! 
                            Truth be told,
                                no rational person expected that any newly
                                crafted movement could wave a magic wand and
                                immediately solve all the social, political,
                                economic, cultural and economic problems
                                plaguing society. The suffrage movement, the
                                labor movement, the modern civil rights
                                movement, and other associated movements never
                                hit the jackpot with their initial efforts. Amid
                                the rabid fear, anger, despair, and various
                                challenges that besiege this current
                                depressingly adversarial moment, a movement such
                                as “No Kings” could represent the birth of a new
                                political statement. In essence, the “No Kings”
                                protesters are almost certainly united in their
                                desire to restore the liberal-democratic
                                environment that will afford them the
                                opportunity to engage in a rational examination
                                and exchange of ideas without potentially being
                                subjected to political or legal consequences. 
                            Almost a year
                                into the most derelict, incompetent, vengeful,
                                      lawless, and arguably politically
                                      ruthless presidency this
                                nation has ever endured, millions of Americans
                                are still frantically searching for an answer.
                                They want a rapid reversal of the status quo,
                                hanging their hopes on Democratic and swing
                                voters voting for the Democratic Party in next
                                year’s midterms. Movements such as “No
                                      Kings”
                                  provide the opportunity for people to
                                  congregate and find like-minded community. 
                            The reality is that all acts of
                                resistance, regardless of their size, increase
                                in momentum. Massive efforts to mobilize
                                citizens are not solely about numbers; they are
                                about persuading public perception and the
                                larger narrative. Given the current state of
                                affairs, we should embrace rather than forsake
                                or ridicule such resistance. The protests will
                                hopefully be the genesis of a larger movement
                                for individuals of all stripes to adopt the
                                principles of economic fairness, racial and
                                gender equality, sexual preference, religious
                                diversity, and other aspects that are crucial to
                                maintaining a diverse, pluralistic, and largely
                                tolerant, preferably accepting society. 
                             | 
                           
                           |