To paraphrase the UK’s, late Queen
Elizabeth II when she referred to 1992 in a
speech delivered at Guildhall on November 24th
as “a year that she would not look on with
undiluted pleasure.” 2025 is similarly, not a
year that many academics and higher education
teachers in general will look upon with serene
thoughts. It was indeed a challenging year, or
as the late queen said, an “annus horribilis”
for postsecondary education. It was a
particularly distressing year for many
historians, especially those of us who focus
their scholarship on racial, gender, social, and
cultural history. Indeed, the day he was
inaugurated last year, Donald Trump wasted no
time in dismantling many progressive and
apolitical institutions that have been of
tremendous benefit to Americans irrespective of
race, gender, religion, sexual orientation,
economic background, geographic region, etc.
Organizations such as the National
Institutes of Health, the US
Institute of Peace, the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, and the John
F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts have witnessed Trump’s
callous destruction of their institutions.
The Trump administration also
attacked the 179-year-old Smithsonian
Institution. Established by Congress in
1846 and based in Washington, DC, the
Smithsonian is a conglomeration of twenty-one
museums, including the popular National Museum
of Natural History and National Air and Space
Museum bordering the National Mall, in addition
to numerous educational and research centers.
Each of these institutions provides ample
opportunity for visitors to learn about nature,
art, and our rich, diverse, and pluralistic
history.
To be certain, avid observers of
the news media are astute to the fact that Trump
and his administration waged nothing short of
guerrilla warfare on the Smithsonian last spring
with a disingenuous executive order titled “Restoring
Truth and Sanity to American History.” Trump argued (without proof)
that the Smithsonian had come under “the
influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology”
and had attempted to “rewrite history” in an
effort to discredit various segments of the
population and, by extension, the nation.
Interestingly, although not surprisingly, given
the administration’s assault on racial and
gender diversity, Trump specifically targeted
the National
Museum of African American History and
Culture and the forthcoming
Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum for
derision and criticism.
More recently, the Trump
administration dismantled a display featuring
nine Black people whom the nation’s first
president George Washington enslaved. The exhibit
was removed from the president’s house
in Independence National Historical Park in
accordance with a White House directive to
remove or obscure material that “inappropriately
disparages Americans.” Yes, you read that correctly.
Let’s be honest. For centuries,
large segments of White Americans described
slavery as a benevolent institution developed to improve the
behavior of and civilize supposedly “savage and
heathen-like” Africans. Such reductive and
intellectually dishonest rhetoric was routinely
taught in churches, schools, and private clubs
and memorialized in statues.
Such retrograde mythology was
largely easy to promote in the late nineteenth
and early twentieth centuries when slavery had
only been abolished for a few decades and
President Rutherford B. Hayes and his Vice
President Samuel Tillman effectively dismantled
Reconstruction (1866–1877) in less than two
decades. White southerners made
ample excuses to defend the institution. For many individuals below the
Mason–Dixon Line, slavery was not the issue;
rather, it was the “the
War of Northern Aggression” aka the
Civil War that bestowed freedom on Black
people, who, according to this perverse
historical narrative, neither desired nor were
worthy of any sort of emancipation. Truth be
told, I remember when I began teaching at my
local university that I could walk into
certain bookstores and notice titles such as The South Won the Civil War and The War of Northern Aggression that promoted the
institution of slavery. Discussions with some of
my students were intense, revelatory, and
riveting. The truth is that, in many ways, one
could make a relatively feasible argument that
the south did indeed win the Civil War,
particularly after Reconstruction was dismantled
and the region returned to its previous
practices of blatantly subjugating,
discriminating, demonizing, terrorizing, and
humiliating Black citizens for the better part
of a century right up until the late 1950s. From
a historical perspective, that is comparatively
recent.
Our current political and
cultural climate virtually necessitates the need
for such reinforcement. Anyone who has a pulse
and is socially and culturally aware recognizes
the current challenges facing Black Americans
and other BIPOC. Brazenly racially divisive
right-wing politicians are adamantly igniting
the flames of racial and cultural animosity and
division. Since the time of this nation’s
inception, Black Americans have had to wage a
historically long and arduous battle, fighting
to obtain rights that the constitution was
supposed to guarantee and that many other groups
have taken for granted. The mountains and
minefields that our ancestors faced head-on and,
in many cases, triumphed over - despite
seemingly unrelenting adversity - are a
testament to their indomitable strength and
spirit.
Truth be told, racism is deeply
ingrained in our culture’s fabric and is as
American as apple pie. What we have witnessed
over the past several years is blatant,
undisguised bigotry - the type that many White
people had to keep disguised and leashed since
the 1950s or at least the early 1960s - that
is now unapologetically permeating various
sectors of our society, in many cases without
consequences. We are enduring the same bigotry
today in the twenty-first century. Being Black
in America often means waging an ongoing battle.
It means dealing with history and people that
blood, sweat, tears, pain, occasional dashed
dreams, setbacks, and periodic victories have
defined.
Black history should not be
confined to discussions about servitude and
feel-good stories to assuage the frail and
fragile sensibilities of those who desire not to
be introduced to or reminded of dark and sordid
chapters of our nation’s history that were less
than harmonious or pristine to certain segments
of its citizenry. Rather, the history of Black
people, like other ethnic groups, is one that
deserves full and unalloyed acknowledgment.
Despite sinister efforts by some on the right to
suppress, marginalize, if not attempt to
nullify, Black history; such efforts will never
reach fruition. The history of Black Americans
is one that is deeply interwoven and firmly
etched in the political, social, cultural,
religious, economic and all other aspects of the
nation. Thus, no amount of perverse revisionism
or fierce efforts to obscure or whitewash the
stoic, powerful and esteemed history of a
fiercely impervious and undeniably resilient
peoples will succeed. Period.
|
|