Home      
                 
 


 



 



President Joe Biden made a campaign promise to alleviate some student loandebt, and on August 24, he honored his commitment. Some say it is too little. Obstructionists say it is too much. Some economists say itmay be inflationary, and loan defaulters like Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green, who defaulted on a federal loan of her own, say it is“not fair” that some taxpayers should subsidize others. I say that student loan forgiveness is a step in the right direction.It is a drop in the bucket, to be sure, but it is a critical drop that makes way for a more insightful analysis of the cost ofattendance and how people pay for higher education.

The headlines have focused that everyone with federal student loan debtwill get $10,000 of forgiveness for that debt. Those with Pell grants and student loans will get $20,000 in debt forgiveness. Any amount ofloan forgiveness is a good thing, but for those who carry six figures worth of debt, it’s just a drop in the bucket. When I wasPresident of Bennett College, I’d often look at the debt that some of my graduates were carrying, sometimes as much as $50,000 or$60,000. Why? They may have had some grants but had to take out loans to cover their cost of attendance. Most colleges use the interest ontheir endowment to provide scholarships. Many HBCUs with small endowments have less grant money to offer than richly endowedcolleges.

Before the pandemic, student loan repayments began six months aftergraduation. After six months, interest began accruing. Students who did not find jobs still had hundreds of dollars of loans to repay,regardless of their employment status. Because interest continued to accrue, some students owed more three years after graduation thanthey did when they graduated. Nearly half of all Black college graduates owe 12.5 percent more than they did when they graduated,mainly because of accrued interest. In contrast, 83 percent of white students owe less. What’s the difference? Family assistance.Black families have just a tenth of the wealth of white families.

While the loan forgiveness amounts are being trumpeted, I think the moresignificant part of President Biden’s announcement is the change in repayment terms and structure. Currently, loan repaymentsare capped at 10 percent of gross income, with forgiveness happening after ten years. The new terms cap repayments at 5 percent withforgiveness after ten years. These new terms provide income flexibility for millions of borrowers who postpone adult decisionsbecause of the heavy burden of student loan debt. Some defer marriage and childbearing, new home and furniture purchases, and even aspectsof career advancement because of their student loans.

Consider a graduate with a passion for education. She is agile in mathematicsand would be a great math teacher. She could also go into some aspect of the finance industry as a bank, broker, or portfolio manager andearn twice what she’d make as a teacher. With student loans crushing her, she might pragmatically choose finance instead ofteaching. With a little help, she might follow her first love and go to the classroom. She might be forced to choose a lucrative butunfulfilling career with student loan shackles.

Too many have raised a “fairness” and “equity”argument to oppose Biden’s plan. It’s a done deal, y’all, and President Biden needs to do more. Let’s pause and applaudthe Biden-Harris administration for this step in the right direction. And let’s ask those attempting to incite class warfare aboutthe roots of their objection. Few Republicans opposed the 45th President’s tax cuts. Instead, they applauded them. The rest ofus paid for them. I didn’t hear the MAGA right lamenting that most of us were paying for tax breaks for just a few of us. WhenBlack businesses had difficulty qualifying for PPP loans because of the paperwork load, I didn’t hear Republicans suggesting thatless-advantaged companies were subsidizing, through their taxes, better-advantaged businesses. Some multi-million dollar franchisesseeking relief were shamed into turning their loan money back. The equity argument is nonsensical and deceptive, and for the record,most of the loan forgiveness goes to people who earn less than $75,000 a year.

Thank you, President Biden, for this drop in the bucket. May you beinspired to do more, including examining higher education financing. What would it take to make undergraduate education free for everyone?






BC Editorial Board Member Dr. Julianne Malveaux, PhD (JulianneMalveaux.com) is dean of the College of Ethnic Studies at Cal State, the Honorary Co-Chair of the Social Action Commission of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated and serves on the boards of the Economic Policy Institute as well as The Recreation Wish List Committee of Washington, DC. Her latest book is Are We Better Off? Race, Obama and Public Policy. A native San Franciscan, she is the President and owner of Economic Education a 501 c-3 non-profit headquartered in Washington, D.C. During her time as the 15th President of Bennett College for Women, Dr. Malveaux was the architect of exciting and innovative transformation at America’s oldest historically black college for women. Contact Dr. Malveaux and BC.



Bookmark and Share






















Bookmark and Share